Comments on: weirdest damned thing

By: J.E.

J.E. — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:11:04 +0000

Ned,

We’ve been talking about customizing the header since the week the blog went online.

No worries. None at all. Not one.

J. E.

By: Shotts

Shotts — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:01:54 +0000

Here here! Nice work, Tob, on the new header with the familiar plateau that is the non-virtual home of the Hollow Men! I liked the car and the tunnel, but I agree with J. E.–this is much better, and certainly more appropriate.

–Shotts

By: Ned

Ned — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:35:03 +0000

J.E. and Company,

I wasn’t serious. That was the point. The present header is fine. I thought the bit about threatening the other Jeff Peters would have put my comments in the “clearly sarcastic” category, along with the “all-out-assault” comment.

I apologize for the perceived irascibility of my comments. Once again, a tone foible on my blogging abilities.

Ned

By: J.E.

J.E. — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:09:36 +0000

Nice work on the header Toby!

Now isn’t that better everyone?

J. E.

By: Shotts

Shotts — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:27:27 +0000

I’ll wallow a bit longer.

jejohnson.com is worth a visit, if you’re interested in mechanical service and installation in Michigan. And I know you are.

–Shotts

By: Pete

Pete — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:24:17 +0000

nah, let’s wallow in this a while longer. there is a J.E.Johnson site too, after all. I can’t remember if it is JEjohnson or J.E.Johnson, but it is worth a look. jp

By: J.E.

J.E. — Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:07:21 +0000

Ned,

For seriously.

J. E.

By: Ned

Ned — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:10:20 +0000

Toby,
Is there a template that you have been using? Where does that damn tunnel image come from? I vote for a change of presentation, as nice as this was. I can’t abide this. It is an all out assault on our sense of individuality. The only other option is to threaten the double until he agrees to change his. However, since I am not a proponent of intimidation or violence, and I have the sneaking suspicion that the photo is a template. I say we move on…
Ned

By: Ned

Ned — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:05:26 +0000

Pete,
I visited this site and I think it is simply the curse of a common name. There is no website, similar or disimilar, under the name ngannon, nedgannon, gannon, or egannon. So I think whatever doppelganger you’ve got out there, the rest of us are probably free and clear. Sorry.
Ned

By: Shotts

Shotts — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:40:45 +0000

Uh, wow. This is like stepping into the bizarro world. Peters, have you been to New York recently without telling anyone, and then posting your photos of the trip? How is it that this web site is more or less exactly the same as the HM site? There has to be some explanation here…

–Shotts